home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!rsoft!mindlink!a710
- From: Crawford_Kilian@mindlink.bc.ca (Crawford Kilian)
- Subject: Re: Dangling Participle;is this grammer?
- Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:27:51 GMT
- Message-ID: <19293@mindlink.bc.ca>
- Sender: news@deep.rsoft.bc.ca (Usenet)
- Lines: 30
-
- Scott Thune offers a definition of a dangling participle as a phrase that
- doesn't seem related to anything in the sentence. The problem is that the
- participle must refer to the subject, so that in Scott's examples--
-
- Before deciding on a strategy, a date has to be choosen.
-
- On coming back to school, baby-sitters aren't easy to
- find.
-
- The date has to do the deciding (I ignore the misspelling of "chosen"), and
- baby-sitters are the ones coming back to school. To correct them we might
- write:
-
- Before deciding on a strategy, we have to choose a date.
- When mothers go back to school, baby-sitters aren't easy to find. (In this
- case we've changed the participial phrase to a subordinate clause; if we
- wanted to keep the participle, we could write: On coming back to school,
- mothers have trouble finding baby-sitters.)
-
- Most participial phrases begin sentences, but moving them to the end doesn't
- change the problem. You just have to remember that what's in the phrase must
- apply to the subject, and write the sentence accordingly.
-
-
- --
- Crawford Kilian Communications Department Capilano College
- North Vancouver BC Canada V7J 3H5
- Usenet: Crawford_Kilian@mindlink.bc.ca
- Internet: ckilian@first.etc.bc.ca
-
-