home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.utils.bug
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!friedman
- From: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman)
- Subject: Re: suggestions for getopt*.c in libiberty
- Message-ID: <9301070816.AA19825@kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
- Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
- Reply-To: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu
- Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
- References: <9301060807.AA02614@cygnus.com>
- Distribution: gnu
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 08:16:52 GMT
- Approved: bug-gnu-utils@prep.ai.mit.edu
- Lines: 7
-
- >The efficiency of getopt is particularly irrelevant - even if
- >it made a difference, why do you think the system version is preferable?
-
- It's probably not, in fact. GNU getopt allows users to specify options
- and arguments in any order, whereas traditional getopt implementations
- *require* options first.
-
-