home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:4272 talk.philosophy.misc:3194 alt.usage.english:10325
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,talk.philosophy.misc,alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!gtoal
- From: gtoal@pizzabox.demon.co.uk (Graham Toal)
- Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF
- Message-ID: <C0HBvM.3G5@demon.co.uk>
- Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
- Sender: news@demon.co.uk
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pizzabox.demon.co.uk
- Organization: Cuddlehogs Anonymous
- References: <1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu> <KEVIN.93Jan5162507@calamityjane.edscom.demon.co.uk> <1993Jan7.004313.19059@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 10:30:57 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <1993Jan7.004313.19059@husc3.harvard.edu> zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes:
- :>You object to the use of the word "free" in "Free Software Foundation"
- :>because the "freedom" is restricted by a caveat in the form of the
- :>General Public Licence. Many contributors have already pointed out that
- :>"free" is always restricted by the context in which it is used, so you
- :>can't use a linguistic argument.
- :
- :I am not using a linguistic argument.
-
- Well in that case would you mind keeping it out of alt.usage.english please?
-
- G
-