home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky gnu.misc.discuss:4260 alt.society.anarchy:1043
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!news.udel.edu!me.udel.edu!johnston
- From: johnston@me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston)
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,alt.society.anarchy
- Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF
- Message-ID: <C0GCoE.2LE@news.udel.edu>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 21:50:37 GMT
- References: <1993Jan5.090712.9584@uwasa.fi> <2B49ED1A.7405@tct.com> <1993Jan6.132121.13286@hellgate.utah.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.udel.edu
- Organization: University of Delaware
- Lines: 49
- Nntp-Posting-Host: me.udel.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan6.132121.13286@hellgate.utah.edu> Greg Alt writes:
-
- [ ... quoting a line of Mr. Alt's and using it to make a
- completely tangential point ... ]
-
- >But it is true that there would be less commercial products.
-
- I can't see this happening under any scenario. People may be
- finding it harder to make big bucks with commercial software,
- but this trend would continue regardless of whether the GPL
- increases in popularity. The GPL is just another way to
- publish software, and it competes with others that are still
- quite healthy.
-
- In the hypothetical "post-scarcity" society that has been
- used as an example somewhere in the FSF literature (doesn't
- matter where) there will most certainly be those who will
- continue to trade in intellectual property under a variety
- of terms. This is just human nature - people like to make
- and trade neat things.
-
- If humanity reaches a state in which people are less concerned
- about where their next meal is coming from, the numbers who choose
- to trade in intellectual property will have to increase - what
- else would people do in such a world? Creating and consuming
- software, music, videos, etc. is fun.
-
- In such a world, the price that one could charge for trading
- in such things on a proprietary basis will be limited by
- increased competition. It doesn't really matter whether the
- competition comes from people who do it on a proprietary basis
- but more cheaply, on a "truly-free" PD basis, or under GPL-like
- restrictions.
-
- Fewer programmers? I doubt it. It's more likely that society
- will redefine necessity so as to cause itself to require more
- of what people enjoy doing.
-
- Such speculation may seem a bit self-indulgent when considers
- that the current state of the world is far from "post-scarcity".
-
- Still, for those who insist on worrying about how the future
- will look if the GPL is not stamped out immediately - take a
- look at the big picture. Microsoft isn't going away; neither
- is Apple (~$8 billion) - or any of the other vicious hoarders
- that pay most of the salaries in the software business.
- --
- -- Bill Johnston (johnston@me.udel.edu)
- -- 38 Chambers Street; Newark, DE 19711; (302)368-1949
-