home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.mtholyoke.edu!jbotz
- From: jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz)
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
- Subject: Re: SUGGESTION: Include libg++ in the next version of gcc.
- Date: 11 Jan 1993 21:18:09 -0500
- Organization: Mount Holyoke College
- Lines: 15
- Sender: news@mtholyoke.edu
- Message-ID: <1it9p1INNe7t@slab.mtholyoke.edu>
- References: <1gqc0gINN3b6@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <amos.726773731@sol>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slab.mtholyoke.edu
-
- >keith@msmri.med.ubc.ca writes:
- >>
- >> Since gcc-lib is included in gcc-2.3.2 why not include g++-lib
- >> in future releases of gcc. This would make installation of gcc
- >> much easier.
-
- This doesn't make any sense... gcc-lib isn't an equivalent of libg++,
- glibc is... and it isn't included either. Besides, how would packaging
- the two together simplify installation? What you really want is for the
- gcc distribution to use the Cygnus GNU-tools directory layout, and that
- will presumably happen one of these days. But they still shouldn't be
- packaged in a single tar file... that would be rediculous.
- --
- Jurgen Botz, jbotz@mtholyoke.edu
- Northampton, MA, USA
-