home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!emory!gatech!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mercury.unt.edu!sol!amos
- From: amos@sol.acs.unt.edu (Amos A. Gouaux)
- Subject: Re: SUGGESTION: Include libg++ in the next version of gcc.
- Message-ID: <amos.726773731@sol>
- Sender: usenet@mercury.unt.edu (UNT USENet Adminstrator)
- Organization: University of North Texas
- References: <1gqc0gINN3b6@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 17:35:31 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- keith@msmri.med.ubc.ca writes:
- >
- > Since gcc-lib is included in gcc-2.3.2 why not include g++-lib
- > in future releases of gcc. This would make installation of gcc
- > much easier.
- >
-
- problem is the size of the source. this would be a massive package.
- for those not interested in c++, this size might be a real hindrance,
- particularly on systems with limited space.
-
- although, perhaps one approach would be to have two gcc packages, one
- with libg++ and one without. the way libg++ is distributed, seems
- like this would be rather easy to facilitate. the configure step
- could apply to both. with libg++, it almost looks like this might be
- an eventual goal. could this be the case?
-
- --
- amos@unt.edu Amos A. Gouaux (817) 565-4161
- -= Academic Computing Services, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA. =-
-