home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!solace.me.uiuc.edu!tiller
- From: tiller@solace.me.uiuc.edu (Mike Tiller)
- Subject: Possible Bug gcc-2.3.3 [Additional]
- Message-ID: <C0K8G9.2MA@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- Distribution: gnu
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 00:09:43 GMT
- Approved: bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
- Lines: 20
-
- Ok, I'm moron for not including this my post 2 seconds ago. I
- meant to include (honestly).
-
- If I change
-
- int done = 0;
-
- to
-
- int volatile done = 0;
-
- everything works. Is this mandatory for this case (in other
- words do I have to tell the compiler done is volatile?)
-
- Thanks
-
- Michael Tiller
-
-
-
-