home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.unix.sys5.r4:1158 comp.unix.sysv386:17692
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!cass.ma02.bull.com!catfish.az05.bull.com!cibecue!pls
- From: pls@cibecue.az05.bull.com (Paul Schauble)
- Subject: Solaris as a server
- Message-ID: <1993Jan07.191515.13156@catfish.az05.bull.com>
- Sender: news@catfish.az05.bull.com (placeholder for future)
- Organization: Bull HN Information Systems, Inc., Phoenix Product Division
- References: <PCG.93Jan4044924@decb.aber.ac.uk> <1993Jan05.235754.15744@catfish.az05.bull.com> <1993Jan6.141548.24476@crd.ge.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jan 93 19:15:15 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- About time to change the subject line. This is a continuation of the discussion
- on Dell unix and what version they use for a base.
-
- I'm in the design phases for assembling a system whose primary use will be as
- a server to other machines connected via modem.
-
- As I read the Solaris announcement, its focues is as a graphics oriented OS
- for a single-user desktop machine. It is therefore not appropriate for the
- system I'm designing, which will have lots of remote usere and no local users.
-
- Is this correct?
-
- ++PLS
-
-