home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1 / NN_1993_1.iso / spool / comp / unix / question / 15275 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-07  |  971 b 
  1. Xref: sparky comp.unix.questions:15275 comp.unix.programmer:5856 biz.sco.opendesktop:919
  2. Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions,comp.unix.programmer,biz.sco.opendesktop
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!ssd.intel.com!mouli
  4. From: mouli@ssd.intel.com (Chandramouli Narayanan - temp)
  5. Subject: Differences between SUN's RPC and SCO ODT 1.0 RPC
  6. Message-ID: <C0HynD.Kyx@SSD.intel.com>
  7. Keywords: RPC
  8. Sender: usenet@SSD.intel.com
  9. Nntp-Posting-Host: fafhrd
  10. Organization: Supercomputer Systems Divison, Intel Corp.
  11. Distribution: na
  12. Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 18:42:49 GMT
  13. Lines: 12
  14.  
  15.  
  16. Are there any differences between SUN's RPC and Lachman's RPC for
  17. SCO ODT 1.0. Any pointers to documents or observation from working
  18. experience will be helpful. Would appreciate replies by email.
  19. If there are sufficient replies, I'll post a compiled info on
  20. the subject.
  21.  
  22. thanks in advance,
  23. mouli (mouli@ssd.intel.com)
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.