home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!copper!cudnvr!sasurguine
- From: sasurguine@cudnvr.denver.colorado.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
- Subject: Socket/Terminal Control Question
- Message-ID: <1993Jan11.165625.1@cudnvr.denver.colorado.edu>
- Date: 11 Jan 93 16:49:25 GMT
- Sender: netnews@copper.denver.colorado.edu
- Lines: 24
-
- I ain't really sure where to POST this so PUT THOSE FLAME THROWERS DOWN
- PLEASE.
-
- Thank You...
-
- If you have a situation where you would like for A to call B and then let
- B take control of that session via a Terminal. How would you actually
- implement this, and of course the $64,000 question is : is there something
- out there in NETLAND that we could snarf which would allow us to accomplish
- this task:
-
- My limited UNIX programming skills tells me this could be accomplished via
- sockets: That is B is continuously listening for a connection from a
- certain party and when he gets that connection he binds it. And although
- I haven't acutally worked with TLI I would assume that the same thing
- could be accomplished using this TLI Transport in the SVR3+ environment.
-
- If you were SVR2 would you be SOL?
-
- Thanks For Insight into this:
-
- Scott A. Surguine
- Wan Coordinator
- Antarctic Support Associates
-