home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!grivel!alsvid.une.edu.au!mark
- From: mark@alsvid.une.edu.au (Mark Garrett Internet: mark@arvak.une.edu.au Phone: +61 66 20 3859)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc
- Subject: Re: Windows NT Report
- Message-ID: <C0DnqG.Hz@alsvid.une.edu.au>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 10:56:39 GMT
- References: <9212221702.00@rmkhome.UUCP>
- Organization: University of New England - Northern Rivers (Lismore)
- Lines: 18
-
- From article <9212221702.00@rmkhome.UUCP>, by rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly):
- > In article <jfy.725049109@crucis.cis.ksu.edu.cis.ksu.edu> jfy@cis.ksu.edu (Joseph F. Young) writes:
- >>
- >>Yeah right. A Mach-based microkernel and a minimally functional POSIX
- >>interface does not make NT a UNIX OS.
- >
- > It's not even Mach. And it is extremely minimal POSIX.
-
- I'd been under this delusion for some time that MS had done a great
- thing in providing a mach3.0 based system. Wrong!! What I'm now told is
- they have cooked up their own little mess for a kernel, GOD help us all another
- fine mess....
-
-
- Mark :)
- --
- Mark Garrett Internet: mark@arvak.une.edu.au Phone: +61 66 20 3859
- University of New England, Northern Rivers, Lismore NSW Australia.
-