home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!jfc
- From: jfc@athena.mit.edu (John F Carr)
- Subject: Re: process numbers
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.015012.21780@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: achates.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <102939.78394.17730@kcbbs.gen.nz>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 01:50:12 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <102939.78394.17730@kcbbs.gen.nz>
- Craig_Anderson@kcbbs.gen.nz (Craig Anderson) writes:
-
- >Regardless of how many other processes are out there doing their own
- >fork()ing, the channel will still have a signal to noise ratio greater
- >than zero and that is good enough for transmitting error free data.
-
- Reducing the bandwidth of a covert channel, while leaving it theoretically
- exploitable, is worthwhile.
-
- --
- John Carr (jfc@athena.mit.edu)
-