home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.novell:11096 news.groups:25043
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell,news.groups
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!psrc
- From: psrc@pegasus.att.com (Paul S R Chisholm)
- Subject: Re: proposal to rename comp.sys.novell
- Reply-To: psrc@pegasus.att.com (Paul S R Chisholm)
- Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
- Distribution: na
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 01:47:23 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.014723.12621@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
- Followup-To: news.groups
- Summary: let's start with one group (comp.os.netware is fine)
- References: <shephard.726037323@sfu.ca> <viking.726125336@vincent1.iastate.edu> <oes1b1-user.1.726132032@oes1q3.itri.org.tw>
- Sender: psrc@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (Paul S. R. Chisholm)
- Lines: 19
-
- I agree with the suggestion that comp.sys.novell be renamed. I like
- the comp.os.netware suggestion.
-
- I'm generally in favor of reasonable group splits, but I don't see any
- reason to split up the Novell/Netware group. (Would you have suggested
- a split if there wasn't a name change?) If we do split by version,
- we'll need a misc group as well as version groups! (We could start
- with comp.os.network.misc instead of comp.os.netware, but I still don't
- see much advantage. So we wouldn't have to rename if we split later;
- so what?)
-
- All of this is just My Humble Opinion.
-
- Paul S. R. Chisholm, AT&T Bell Laboratories/EasyLink Services,
- att!pegasus!psrc, psrc@pegasus.att.com, AT&T Mail !psrchisholm
- I'm not speaking for *any* company, I'm just speaking my mind.
-
- UNIX(R) will be a registered trademark of Novell
- (If you think that hurts to read, think how much it hurt to type!)
-