home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!caen!destroyer!fmsrl7!ukma!news
- From: kevins@slow.inslab.uky.edu
- Subject: Re: Webster CompactDictionary
- References: <1993Jan8.045521.5089@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 128.163.129.103
- Message-ID: <1993Jan10.235159.26668@ms.uky.edu>
- Organization: University Of Kentucky, Dept. of Math Sciences
- Sender: news@ms.uky.edu (USENET News System)
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 23:51:59 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- David Kelman writes
- -> While looking through the files on NS 3.0, which I finally received
- -> Tuesday after a five month wait, I noticed that in Webster's there is both a
- -> CompactDictionary and a Dictionary. The Compact is 13.6 Meg, while
- -> Dictionary is 20.3 Meg. Are both necessary, or can I delete the compact and
- -> free up a lot of space?
- ->
- -> David Kelman
- ->
- ->
- -> --
- -> The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
- -> North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
- -> Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
- -> internet: laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
-
- I "think" the data is redundant. I've removed the compact dict and have
- had no prob.
-
- --
- _______________________________________________________________________________
- "There's a reason for everything."
-
- Kevin Solie
- Director of Developement: benchMark Developements, Inc.
-
-