home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!kth.se!hemul.nada.kth.se!d88-jwa
- From: d88-jwa@hemul.nada.kth.se (Jon Wtte)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Subject: Re: Why the Piracy? Here's why...
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.131642.9129@kth.se>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 13:16:42 GMT
- References: <noah-040193095748@noah.apple.com> <1993Jan5.234323.12924@ultb.isc.rit.edu> <MELLON.93Jan5123854@pepper.ncd.com> <1993Jan7.155907.19880@mail.cornell.edu> <tal691.726832013@huxley>
- Sender: usenet@kth.se (Usenet)
- Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hemul.nada.kth.se
-
- In <tal691.726832013@huxley> tal691@huxley.anu.edu.au (Tonio Loewald) writes:
-
- >The cost of AutoCAD vs. MiniCAD.
-
- >In each case, roughly comparable products that are difficult or impossible
- >to pirate are much more expensive.
-
- Or, it just *MIGHT* be that because it's so expensive
- (because it takes so much time to develop) it *HAS* to
- be made impossible to copy, just because they wouldn't
- get paid for their efforts else?
-
- Just maybe? :-)
-
- Cheers,
- --
- -- Jon W{tte, h+@nada.kth.se, Mac Hacker Deluxe --
- This signature is kept shorter than 4 lines in the interests of UseNet
- S/N ratio.
-