home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!manuel.anu.edu.au!huxley!tal691
- From: tal691@huxley.anu.edu.au (Tonio Loewald)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Subject: Re: Why the Piracy? Here's why...
- Message-ID: <tal691.726832678@huxley>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 09:57:58 GMT
- References: <freek.726615644@groucho.phil.ruu.nl>
- Organization: Australian National University
- Lines: 73
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.203.2.12
-
- freek@phil.ruu.nl (Freek Wiedijk) writes:
-
- >I would prefer a world in which there were no intellectual
- >property laws. I don't think it is unethical to copy
- >something. At least, not when the copying doesn't disturb
- >the use of the original item.
-
- The point about knowledge and information is that it is a
- public good -- ie. something that isn't a limited resource
- and thus can be given to everybody at no cost to anyone.
-
- It doesn't make economic sense to charge for software, but
- it does make sense to pay for it to be written. There's
- the rub.
-
- >My reasons for this are the following:
- >1. It's the status quo. Everyone _already_ copies everything
- > (from CD's on DAT, to software on disks, to books on
- > paper).
- >2. I would like there to be a giant reservoir of knowledge
- > that's free for everyone to add to or take from (e.g., the
- > complete library of congress, digitalized, on the
- > Internet; can you say Xanadu? I knew you could!) And I
- > mean that _everything_ should be in it (all science, all
- > literature, all music, all art, etc.). The _main_
- > obstacle for this kind of enterprise is intellectual
- > property law.
- >3. If there was no restriction on copying, there would be a
- > much more `darwinistic' evolution in intellectual
- > products. Inferior programs would stand a much smaller
- > chance of ever being used. (Example: if Apple software
- > was not protected by copyright law, there would be cheap
- > Macintosh clones, and _no-one_ would use MS-DOS or
- > Windows.)
-
- True, but would the Mac OS have been created?
-
- Let's look at it another way:
-
- As far as I know, Kernighan and Ritchie are not deliriously
- wealthy, even though they invented C and this is generally
- considered the coolest language in the known universe, at
- least by most hackers, and this includes Microsoft which
- writes pretty well everything in C or C++.
-
- Bill Gates got where he is today primarily by writing a
- BASIC interpreter and then shafting everybody within reach.
- (Consider this a paraphrasing of "Hard Drive".)
- Oh, and Bill IS deliriously rich.
-
- Now whose behaviour would it be sensible for society to
- reward with 5,000,000,000 dollars or so?
-
- If you look at any intellectual property domain, the wrong people
- are getting all the money. Our intellectual property laws suck,
- and the sooner they're brought to their knees, the better.
-
- >4. The highest grade information that I know is `science'.
- > Try to imagine a world in which you had to _pay_ for each
- > scientific article that you need to look at for your
- > research or if you wanted to build on the results from
- > such an article. In what state would science be in such a
- > world. In other words: I prefer the way information is
- > handled in science to the way it's handled in the software
- > industry.
-
- Tonio
-
- --
- Tonio Loewald | tal691@huxley.anu.edu.au | Life is short. Be nice.
- "You can lie/You can cry/For all the good it'll do you, you can
- die/But when it's done/And the police come/And they lay you down
- for dead/Just remember what I said" (Paul Simon-not the senator)
-