home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.mac.programmer:21013 comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools:1940
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!trsnyder
- From: trsnyder@mcs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
- Subject: Re: Stallman and friends
- Message-ID: <TRSNYDER.93Jan8131959@vf0031.mcs.drexel.edu>
- Date: 8 Jan 93 18:19:59 GMT
- References: <D2150035.mrrnh5@outpost.SF-Bay.org> <1993Jan7.132622.4162@kth.se>
- <1993Jan7.132930.4247@kth.se> <C0HoM3.5G5@news.rich.bnr.ca>
- <1993Jan7.134127.19071@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Organization: ASCI
- Lines: 17
- In-Reply-To: veloso@husc9.harvard.edu's message of 7 Jan 93 18:41:25 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: vf0031.astro.ge.com
-
- In article <1993Jan7.134127.19071@husc3.harvard.edu> veloso@husc9.harvard.edu (Manuel Veloso) writes:
-
- After reading through this thread, it seems that there's a
- perspective on the FSF that seems to have been missed...that their
- software distribution policy (copyleft) is a step towards
- domination of the unix utility market. My unix friends tell me that
- most of the base unix utilities are FSF-made (& better than the
- original); GCC, Emacs, YACC, etc. are better at what they do than
- the commercial versions. Even better, they're free. How, then, can
- a commercial firm compete against well-produced, good quality,
- el-cheapo software? They can't...for long. The implications are,
- well, interesting.
-
- Actually, it's worse than that. They're writing the GNU Herd, a CopyLeft-ed
- variation of UNIX. :-)
-
- Bob
-