home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!chsun!bernina!bernina!neeri
- From: neeri@iis.ethz.ch (Matthias Neeracher)
- Subject: Re: Why does BinHex exist?
- In-Reply-To: howard@netcom.com's message of Thu, 7 Jan 1993 21:01:59 GMT
- Message-ID: <NEERI.93Jan8172740@iis.ethz.ch>
- Sender: news@bernina.ethz.ch (USENET News System)
- Organization: Integrated Systems Laboratory, ETH, Zurich
- References: <1993Jan7.132930.4247@kth.se> <C0HoM3.5G5@news.rich.bnr.ca>
- <1ii16eINN4d0@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1993Jan7.210159.26183@netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:27:40 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1993Jan7.210159.26183@netcom.com>, howard@netcom.com (Howard Berkey) writes:
-
-
- > Periodically people post asking what BinHex is, or where to get it,
- > etc... What I want to know is, Why is it really necessary? It:
-
- > A. Makes the files larger than a binary format
- > B. Is annoying to have to convert
- > C. Doesn't seem to do anything
-
- > I claim C because I have had many mac files stored on a UNIX file
- > system for long periods of time, in MacBinary II, with no ill effects.
- > This has proven true on various Suns, 2 RS-6000's, and 2 HP-9000's.
- > It may be that some machines will damage mac files if they aren't
- > binhexed, and thus it would be neccecary in that case.
-
- They don't get destructed from storing, but they *might* get destructed from
- transmitting. While ftp transfer of macbinary files seems to work for all
- but the most brain damaged ftp clients, I wouldn't recommend to mail one.
-
- Additionally, less people know how to handle MacBinary than BinHex; I
- personally try to distribute files as MacBinary but often get questions
- as to how to translate it and why I didn't store them as BinHex.
-
- Matthias
-
- -----
- Matthias Neeracher neeri@iis.ethz.ch
- "And that's why I am going to turn this world upside down, and make
- of it a fire so *bright* that someone real will notice"
- -- Vernor Vinge, _Tatja Grimm's World_
-