home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!gasser
- From: gasser@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Nathan Gasser)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
- Subject: Re: Background troubles...
- Message-ID: <104538@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 18:52:06 GMT
- Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
- Lines: 28
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eniac.seas.upenn.edu
-
-
- In article <1993Jan12.160745.4826@utkux1.utk.edu> danny@martha.utcc.utk.edu (Danny William McCampbell) writes:
- >Can someone tell me what is wrong with this statement and why it refuses
- >to work?
- >
- >hide bg field id 72 of bg id 5181
- >also
- >hide bg field id 72 of bg "Introduction"
- >
- >Neither of the above work. I would much rather use the first line.
- [...]
-
- Hmmm... I suppose it's another example of us thinking too much for
- our own good. I've tried this before too. You must specify which
- card you wish to hide the field on, even though it doesn't really matter.
- Try:
-
- hide bg fld id 72 of cd (the first cd of bg id 5181)
-
- I think that should work. Else just say "... of cd id 1932" where
- cd id 1932 is a card on bg 5181.
-
- Nate.
-
- --
-
- Nathan Gasser ><>
- gasser@eniac.seas.upenn.edu
-