home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!lsa.umich.edu!ccs.itd.umich.edu!altitude
- From: altitude@css.itd.umich.edu (Alexander King Tang)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: Re: IDE vs. SCSI
- Date: 13 Jan 1993 03:57:30 GMT
- Organization: University of Michigan - ITD Consulting and Support
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <1j03vaINNsvf@stimpy.css.itd.umich.edu>
- References: <1993Jan13.022450.4732@sun0.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: uglymouse.css.itd.umich.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
-
- I was just wondering how good a Future Domain 1660 SCSI contoller is? It uses
- a device format called CAM (Common Access Method). NOT ASPI, which is supposed
- to be the standard of the future??? they claim to be poroducing a software
- drivers to let ASPI run on this board. Does anyone have any information
- regarding this?
-
- Second. I found a Rodime 210MB SCSI drive mode RO3259T real cheap.
- I was thinking of buying this drive 'cuz it's cheap. Any info on this too?
- Thanx.
-
- --
- ...Alex...
-
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- | Alex Tang, U of M School of Natural Resources and Environment Student. |
- | CSS/ITD Consultant. |
- |USERW00Y@UMICHUM.BITNET {BITNET} | ALTITUDE@UMICH.EDU {INTERNET}|
- | Remember, Wherever you go... There you are. --BB |
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-