home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!pv7426.vincent.iastate.edu!palane
- From: palane@iastate.edu (Paul A. Lane)
- Subject: Re: Why memory costs doubled
- Message-ID: <palane.726793152@pv7426.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- References: <103692@netnews.upenn.edu> <C0n9Cx.5Gv@icon.rose.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 22:59:12 GMT
- Lines: 44
-
- In <C0n9Cx.5Gv@icon.rose.hp.com> scott@mothra.rose.hp.com (Scott Bobo) writes:
-
- >And while everyone applaudsour government's domestic efforts at "trust-
- >busting" and "free trade", our government continues to permit free access
- >to our market for two of the largest cartels in the world: Mid-east Oil
- >and Far East Memory.
-
- I'm not sure what one has to do with the other. OPEC exists to keep oil
- prices high and is a (collapsing) government cartel. However, let's re-
- strict the discussion to issues related to computers.
-
- I'm glad you said Far East memory. South Korea is busily undercutting the
- Japanese at the moment. If S.K. manages to dominate memory for awhile,
- someone else will take the market from them.
-
- <Various references to MITI deleted>
-
- You need to keep up on your geography. There are no agreements among memory
- producers in different countries (by the way, don't forget Siemans [Germany]).
- I'm not going to bother with a detailed rebuttal. Among other matters, your
- arguments are outdated (several years). Memory is an example of a U.S. in-
- dustry whose clock was cleaned. Microprocessors and computers are a counter-
- example. Far Eastern companies were getting crushed by nimble U.S. manufac-
- turers. That's why Hyundai (S.K.) moved its entire design and production
- facilities to the U.S. What comes around goes around.
-
- >The reason that Japan is so obviously successful in this war and the United
- >States is not is that the government of Japan has adopted tactics appropriate
- >to the world market of the 90's, while the United States is still saddled
- >with policy dating back to the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.
-
- What bothers me about these sorts of arguments is that they are irrelevent
- to U.S. competitiveness. I think you have a valid point about MITI. However,
- I don't think that we should adopt the oligopolistic systems of economics
- that Japan has. It doesn't fit the strengths of our culture. There are ex-
- amples of failed cooperatives.
-
- >Open your eyes.
-
- Wide open.
-
- >Scott
-
- Paul
-