home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!pv7428.vincent.iastate.edu!palane
- From: palane@iastate.edu (Paul A. Lane)
- Subject: Re: Gateway 2000 486DX2-66V vs. Zeos 486DX2-66 VESA Local Bus System
- Message-ID: <palane.726565508@pv7428.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- References: <FRIEDMAN.93Jan6232406@khan.trincoll.edu> <31500@nntp_server.ems.cdc.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 07:45:08 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In <31500@nntp_server.ems.cdc.com> ahummel@ems.cdc.com (H. Austin Hummel) writes:
-
- >In article <FRIEDMAN.93Jan6232406@khan.trincoll.edu>, friedman@starbase.trincoll.edu (Mark A. Friedman) writes:
- >|> I've narrowed the choice of what system I will buy to two and now wish
- >|> to make a final decision between the Gateway 2000 486DX2-66V and the
- >|> Zeos 486DX2-66 VESA Local Bus System. The systems seem comparable in
- >|> terms of performance, features and cost in terms of my needs and
- >|> budget. I will be buying only a system unit (i.e. motherboard,
- >|> processor, memory, etc. within a tower case) and hard disk but no
- >|> monitor nor graphics card from one of these two vendors.
-
- >Latest issue of PC Magazine- editor Choice Gateway 2000 486DX2-66V
-
- However, the ZEOS was one of the runner-ups, primarily because of a weak
- monitor. Howeverm, its graphics subsystem was the fastest ever seen.
- Given that you won't be buying video, this is not a consideration.
-
-