home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!news!humu!nctams1!nctams1!pnet16!n9312m
- From: n9312m@pnet16.cts.com (Et3 Panzica)
- Subject: Re: NEC vs. MAG
- Organization: People-Net [pnet16], NCTAMS EASTPAC
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 20:36:03 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.203603.11584@nctams1.uucp>
- Sender: root@nctams1.uucp (Super user)
- Lines: 31
-
- hih@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Howard I Heisler) writes:
- >
- > I have narrowed my search for a multisync monitor down to two choices,
- >the NEC 3fgx and the MAG. I have read a lot of good things about both
- >monitors and they seem to be in the same price range.
-
- Are you sure about your options??
-
- I have a Viewsonic 5E at home that I'm am extremely happy with, but, I'm
- happy to say that I'm replacing it with a new monitor due in next week...
- a Viewsonic 7!! In my opinion, you CANNOT beat the price/performance value
- of the Viewsonic line. The picture on my 14" is super clean and it
- supports refresh rates up to 72Hz in 1024x768 (if you don't yet have a card
- that supports 72 or 70Hz at 1024, get one... it can make all the difference
- in the world!). Support for non-interlaced ops at this res and refresh rate
- is also included. The only drawback to the monitor is the lack of digital
- controls with memory settings... boy, if they added these the monitor would
- really be great. I don't think that the difference of 1" in viewing area
- between 14 and 15 inches is worth 200+ dollars. If you feel it is, have you
- looked at the new V6FS?
-
- I'm sticking with the Viewsonic line... period.
-
- ---
-
- ` Who said that..? '
- Michael Vincent Panzica
-
- INET: n9312m@pnet16.cts.com
- UUCP: humu!nctams1!pnet16!n9312m
- ARPA: humu!nctams1!pnet16!n9312m@nosc.mil
-