home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp48
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!smburke
- From: smburke@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Sean M Burke)
- Subject: Increasing IR reception distance
- Message-ID: <1993Jan11.030558.22122@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Summary: Can it be done.
- Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: magnusug.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Organization: The Ohio State University
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 03:05:58 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- I was just playing around with the improved Tricorder programs, I was thinking
- "boy these are neat, but it's a shame they only work a couple of inches away
- from the calc"
-
- So, here's the question. I know hp intentionally made the IR reception poor
- on the 48 to appease professors and whatnot. What I'd like to know, is
- what part of the system decreases the performance. Is it the receiver itself,
- or is there a resistor in series with it? Is there any way to improve the IR
- reception on the 48?
-
-
- --
- Sean M. Burke \ "Love is what goes on while you're NOT horny. . ."
- Burke.63@osu.edu \_________ "You live and learn. Or you don't live long."
- bf274@cleveland.freenet.edu\______ "While we live, let us LIVE!"
- IRC: Hanz (No, I won't pump U up.)\__________________________________________
-