home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!hippo!ee.und.ac.za!csir.co.za!olsa99!mje99!mje
- From: mje@posix.co.za
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
- Subject: Re: Can you do uucp over tcp/ip on 3b2/1000
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.051433.570@posix.co.za>
- Date: 4 Jan 93 05:14:33 GMT
- References: <C04y3C.8M4@mpls911.uucp> <23074@drutx.ATT.COM>
- Organization: Mark's Machine (Working for Olivetti Africa)
- Lines: 24
-
- In <23074@drutx.ATT.COM> vqh@dwrock.att.com (D461-Viet_Q_Hoang(0)82572) writes:
-
- >From article <C04y3C.8M4@mpls911.uucp>, by kevin@mpls911.uucp (Kevin Herrboldt):
- >> gulik@rtsg.mot.com (Gregory Gulik) writes:
- >>> In article <1hahu3INNk70@matt.ksu.ksu.edu> mgriffin@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Mark Griffin) writes:
- >>
- >> Basically, you use nlsadmin to add a uucico service to the network
- >> listener:
-
- >Just a note: if you didn't load RFS, you also need to modify
- >/etc/rc2.d/S86win3b to run 'nlsadmin -s tcp' to start the listener at
- >boot time.
-
- Strange thing is - if one examines the source code of uucico, all the
- hooks are there to get UUCP to run bezerlkey style, ie for connecting
- to 'uucpd' at the far end. I think I needed to as 2 or 3 lines of 'C'
- to get it completely to work - and #define a line or two. You don't
- get 'cu' running in the same manner (use telnet) but uucp falls much
- better into the usual plan of things then. Strange decisions happen
- at AT&T. I wonder why they did this?
- --
- . . ___. .__ Olivetti Systems & Networks, Unix Support - Africa
- /| /| / /__ UUCP: uunet!olsa99!mje (Mark J. Elkins)
- / |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS mje@olive.co.za (Postmaster) Tel: +27 11 456 3125
-