home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!caen!sdd.hp.com!usc!rutgers!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmfra!lionet
- From: lionet@lionfl.adsp.sub.org (Francois Lionet)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: AMOS - is it any good?
- Message-ID: <eLhfs*r82@lionfl.adsp.sub.org>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 09:54:22 GMT
- References: <crystal.725777678@glia> <1992Dec31.195211.11537@news.uiowa.edu>
- Reply-To: lionet@lionfl.adsp.sub.org (Francois Lionet)
- Organization: Not an organization
- Lines: 29
- X-Newsreader: Arn V1.00 alpha rel2
-
- In article <1992Dec31.195211.11537@news.uiowa.edu>, Michael T Pins writes:
-
- > The short answer is, no, it's not any good.
- > I have yet to see a single AMOS program that doesn't have massive amounts of
- > Enforcer hits. Considering the amount of AMOS programs that people have sent
- > me, it would certainly indicate that the problem is with AMOS itself.
-
- Well, sorry. I keep enforcer on with sushi on my system, and I can tell
- you that the actual versions of AMOS does NOT produce ANY enforcer hit (1.34).
- Of course the first versions of the langage did, mainly because of my
- bad knowledge of the Amiga at first. Versions before 1.2 where absolutely
- terrible for this.
-
- The update for the very last version of AMOS are PD. Yes it means FREE.
- You dont have to pay for them, and you can get them in any PD library.
-
- What more can I do? I mean if people want to keep the old version, I cant
- force them to get the new ones.
- So I tell you, last version of AMOS, is 1.34, same for the compiler.
- An update of AMOSPro (1.1) will be out in about 10 days, in PD as well.
-
- By the way, I can tell you frankly, AMOS _is_ good ;-)
-
- --
- "The words of AMOS: proclaim free-will and publish!"
- (Old Testament, AMOS 4.5)
- Francois Lionet
- cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmfra!lionfl!lionet
- lionet@lionfl.adsp.sub.org
-