home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!ruuinf!clldomps
- From: clldomps@cs.ruu.nl (Louis van Dompselaar)
- Subject: Re: ReOrg ever fatally messed up?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.110857.18034@cs.ruu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 11:08:57 GMT
- References: <C0Cyrn.DBz@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <bmccnnll.726278364@unix1.tcd.ie> <kruse.726322168@eola.cs.ucf.edu>
- Organization: Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science
- Lines: 23
-
- In <kruse.726322168@eola.cs.ucf.edu> kruse@cs.ucf.edu (Holger Kruse ) writes:
-
- >>Has anyone had ReOrg trash their HD? I can't afford a decent backup
- >>method for my HD, but it needs defragmenting.
- >
- >Be sure to use V2.33. I have received no serious bug reports for that
- >version yet. But anyway, you REALLY should back up your drive - at least
- >when you run ReOrg for the first time. And be sure to set ReOrg to
- >default settings.
- >
-
- Remember that it is often unnecessary to back-up everything on your HD,
- as most people will keep original disks of software anyway. I only
- back-up some areas of my own data now and again, nothing more. Needs
- only about 10 disks for 40Mb. And not having a backup program is
- a bad exuse, as one comes with OS 2.
-
- Louis
- --
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- Louis van Dompselaar (clldomps@cs.ruu.nl) 4th year cs student
- ** *** *** *** *** ** * **** * **** * **** ** ** * *
-