home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cbmvax!ross
- From: ross@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ross Hippely - Manuals)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Commodity question
- Message-ID: <38444@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 9 Jan 93 23:44:54 GMT
- References: <38291@cbmvax.commodore.com> <wanderer.03pd@tcsi.appleton.mil.wi.us> <crystal.726437518@glia> <1993Jan7.222820.13563@hubcap.clemson.edu> <38416@cbmvax.commodore.com> <crystal.726524912@glia>
- Reply-To: ross@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ross Hippely - Manuals)
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
- Lines: 75
- Keywords: manuals documentation 2.04
- Summary: A point to consider
-
- In article <crystal.726524912@glia> crystal@glia.biostr.washington.edu (Crystal) writes:
- >In <38416@cbmvax.commodore.com> ross@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ross Hippely - Manuals) writes:
-
- [...discussion of undocumented disk items in C= disks, of which I said:]
-
- >>...in general, stuff that is undocumented should be left alone.
- >
- >If it is undocumented, then it shouldn't even be included.
-
- Um, I believe you mean, "If it is included, it should be documented." :-)
-
- > Not everyone who
- >buys a computer is programming whiz. Nor do they understand not to play with
- >things that are undocumented.
-
- True. Adding an explicit statement to the effect that undocumented stuff
- should be left alone is probably a good idea for future C= manuals.
-
- The other option, more troublesome but not out of the question, would be to
- include docs of every little bit, even if it's just to say "This is related
- to so-and-so and you should leave it alone." Is this what you would recommend?
-
- > If it's high-level developmental stuff, then it
- >should not be left out on the table, unattended, where the baby can get
- >into it...
-
- Hmm, I guess we've never looked at our clientele as babies... :-)
-
- >>It's unlikely you'll get a virus on an original disk from Commodore.
- >
- >Uh...I didn't KNOW it came from a Commodore disk. All I knew was that I had
- >some strange program in my directory with a rather ominous sounding name that
- >*I* did not put there.
-
- [Crystal elaborates on her alarm at discovering Enforcer on her HD]
-
- >And with no docs to support what
- >I knew *I* hadn't put on my disk, what's a newbie to think?
- >
- >So, why didn't I LOOK on the original system disk?
-
- I was just going to say...
-
- > Because there were posts
- >saying that Enforcer was on an FTP site, and one saying that it was NOT part
- >of the system software.
-
- And you believed them? Rather than just pop in the disks?
-
- >So, if it was commercial, from C=, why would it be
- >on an FTP site?
-
- Surely you know that there is software that is from Commodore, yet could be
- acquired from other sources? E.g. amigaguide.library, the Installer, and of
- course programming tools like Enforcer...
-
- >Hence, I had to assume it had arrived on my HD by suspicious
- >means.
-
- An assumption so questionably grounded, and so easily checked, to me
- suggests an alarmist response.
-
-
- Still, I am only quibbling. Your basic point is valid. I'll look into how
- we could improve our docs to take account of possible newbie reaction to
- unexplained disk contents.
-
- >Crystal
- > ;>
-
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ross Hippely: Technical Writer
- employed by, not speaking for: Commodore Business Machines Inc.
-
-