home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.misc:19533 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:22520
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!cbmvax!ross
- From: ross@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ross Hippely - Manuals)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: WorkBench 2.1?
- Summary: Yer slightly confused
- Keywords: 2.1
- Message-ID: <38372@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 23:29:16 GMT
- References: <C0BzvM.DE5@newcastle.ac.uk> <1ic777INNfu6@mercury.kingston.ac.uk> <C0Fuyt.LzL@news.cs.andrews.edu>
- Reply-To: ross@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ross Hippely - Manuals)
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <C0Fuyt.LzL@news.cs.andrews.edu> adap@edmund.cs.andrews.edu (Edsel Adap) writes:
- >In article <1ic777INNfu6@mercury.kingston.ac.uk> cs_e445@ceres (Vlod Kalicun) writes:
- >>I.A.Inman@newcastle.ac.uk (I.A. Inman) writes:
- >>:
- >>: Am I missing something here?
- [...]
- >>: What the hec is WB2.1?
- >>
- >>Vlod
- >
- >I thought, the final release of version 2.04 was renamed into version 2.1.
- >So essentially 2.04 is the same as 2.1
- >
- >Am I being mislead here?
-
- No, you're being misleading. :-)
-
- >Anyone from commodore want to verify this?
-
- I'd prefer to refute it. 2.1 is not 2.04.
-
- Maybe you have a bad time sense, and are remembering how, 2 years or so
- ago, what was being discussed as "1.4" became "2.0". Or perhaps how, later,
- the final Release 2 product was actually 2.04, not 2.0. Or something...
-
- >| Procrastination is my sin | Edsel Adap
- >| -Gloria Pitzer| adap@cs.andrews.edu
-
- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Ross Hippely: Technical Writer
- employed by, not speaking for: Commodore Business Machines Inc.
-