home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.misc:19521 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:22498
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!gatech!destroyer!gumby!news.cs.andrews.edu!zds-oem!easton
- From: easton@zds-oem.zds.com (Jeff Easton)
- Subject: Re: WorkBench 2.1?
- Organization: Zenith Data Systems, OEM Systems Engineering
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 18:07:45 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan06.180745.28699@zds-oem.zds.com>
- References: <C0BzvM.DE5@newcastle.ac.uk> <1ic777INNfu6@mercury.kingston.ac.uk> <C0Fuyt.LzL@news.cs.andrews.edu>
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <C0Fuyt.LzL@news.cs.andrews.edu> adap@edmund.cs.andrews.edu (Edsel Adap) writes:
- >In article <1ic777INNfu6@mercury.kingston.ac.uk> cs_e445@ceres (Vlod Kalicun) writes:
- >>I.A.Inman@newcastle.ac.uk (I.A. Inman) writes:
- >>:
- >>: I thought Commodore went straight from WB2.04/2.05 to WB3.0.
- >>
- >>I think it was a beta version of WB3 sent to developers so they can make
- >>sure their progs work under the new opsys.
- >>
- >I thought, the final release of version 2.04 was renamed into version 2.1.
- >So essentially 2.04 is the same as 2.1
- >
- >Am I being mislead here? Anyone from commodore want to verify this?
-
- I've got 2.04 and 2.1 for my A3000 (and 2.03 if anyone cares :-).
- Trust me, they're not the same thing.
-
- The dates of the files on my 2.1 are from spring/summer '92. The dates
- on my 3.0 files (A1200) are late summer/fall. Its possible C= could
- have used 2.1 to beta AGA machines until 3.0 came out...
-
- >| Procrastination is my sin | Edsel Adap
-
- --
- ___ ___ Jeff Easton easton@zds-oem.zds.com
- (__ (__ Zenith Data Systems j.easton@mi04.zds.com
- ___) ___) Saint Joseph, Mich. easton@andrews.edu
- Monte Carlo Z-LS/20 - Choice of a quiet generation
-