home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1 / NN_1993_1.iso / spool / comp / sys / amiga / hardware / 22431 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-06  |  982 b 
  1. Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.hardware:22431 comp.sys.amiga.misc:19473
  2. Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!portal!danb
  4. From: danb@shell.portal.com (Dan E Babcock)
  5. Subject: Re: How does 2.04 perform on A500???????????????????
  6. Message-ID: <C0Ep04.M85@unix.portal.com>
  7. Sender: news@unix.portal.com
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: jobe
  9. Organization: Portal Communications Company -- 408/973-9111 (voice) 408/973-8091 (data)
  10. References: <1heeljINNpcc@uwm.edu> <sheldon.725564784@pv141b.vincent.iastate.edu> <C04BGz.7KA@newcastle.ac.uk>
  11. Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 00:21:39 GMT
  12. Lines: 12
  13.  
  14. In article <C04BGz.7KA@newcastle.ac.uk> I.A.Inman@newcastle.ac.uk (I.A. Inman) writes:
  15. >
  16. >From what I've seen, WB2.04 performs a little slowly on your bog standard Amiga.
  17. >
  18. >If you want to use it seriously, I think a processor accelerator is a good idea.
  19. >
  20. >If WB3.0 becomes available, you'll DEFINITELY need a faster machine.
  21.  
  22. Kickstart 3.0 is faster, not slower, than 2.0.
  23.  
  24. Dan
  25.  
  26.