home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!terapin!boba
- From: boba@terapin.com (Bob Alexander)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
- Subject: Re: ADPro2 really sucks
- References: <C0E762.LB8@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Message-ID: <boba.33z1@terapin.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 23:02:38 PST
- Organization: BBS
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <C0E762.LB8@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, shulick@cineret.ucs.indiana.edu
- (Sam Hulick) writes:
- >
- >Thanks for the replies. I think I'm going to ditch ADPro & get a new
- >graphics package..but which? I want one that's powerful, lots of
- >features, has a NICE interface (another lacking point in ADPro), and
- >manages memory smartly.
- >
- >BTW, where can I get "makeanim"? I can't seem to find it.
- >
- >--
- > // Amiga 3000 ___ \ Sam Hulick: shulick@indiana.edu (NeXTmail OK!)
- > // 68030 25 MHz /__/\ \ My opinions wear combat boots. Or whatever.
- >\\// OS 2.04 \__\/ / "Walk! Not bloody likely. I am going in a
- > \/ / taxi." --George Bernard Shaw
- I personnaly like adpro2. I have the makeanim thing. I also have morph,
- morph plus and fred. Now I have used Imagemaster and cinemorph. Imagemaster has
- afew fx it can do to pics, but it does not have the loaders
- that adpro has. I want to check out image fx in two days so I will fill you in.
- Image fx is supposed to be pretty cool. Cinemorph goes with it. But for me so
- far adpro 2 is it for me. I am not copiling anims through it yet. I just go a
- dctv for my 500 and am going to try ADAM to compile my anim into dctv format. I
- also use Imagine and render to rgb sometimes. Adpro tranfers the formats well
- for me. I will write back as I get more info.
-