home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!pa.dec.com!rdg.dec.com!edieng.enet.dec.com!goodwin
- From: goodwin@edieng.enet.dec.com (Pete Goodwin)
- Subject: Re: A couple of questions.
- Message-ID: <1993Jan11.135222.8555@rdg.dec.com>
- Sender: news@rdg.dec.com (Mr News)
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- Distribution: uk
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 13:23:06 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
-
- In article <6641@falcon.ukc.ac.uk>, jtn@ukc.ac.uk (Jim Noble) writes...
-
- >Can anyone comment on Eureka? How does it compare to using, say, Pipedream?
- >I know someone who is looking for a spreadsheet proggy and wanted to know if
- >Eureka is any good. Comments much appreciated.
-
- I've got PD3 and played with a demo of PD4. I had a look at Eureka. As a
- spreadsheet, Eureka looks better, but occupies 1Mbyte of memory. You've got
- much more flexibility in what you see than PipeDream - for instance you can set
- a column format which you can't do in Pipedream.
-
- Pete Goodwin
- goodwin@edieng.enet.dec.com
-