home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.3b1:4232 comp.mail.misc:4319
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!intercon!psinntp!monymsys!sonyd1.broadcast.sony.com!blilly.uucp!bruce
- From: bruce@blilly.uucp (Bruce Lilly)
- Subject: Re: Sendmail problem on AT&T unix 7300 (3b1).
- References: <1993Jan6.051545.3526@gagme.chi.il.us> <1993Jan7.014459.14742@blilly.uucp> <1993Jan8.225514.5299@cfctech.cfc.com>
- Organization: Bruce Lilly
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 13:12:03 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan10.131203.22124@blilly.uucp>
- Reply-To: lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly)
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1993Jan8.225514.5299@cfctech.cfc.com>,
- posted to comp.sys.3b1,comp.mail.misc,
- kevin@cfctech.cfc.com (Kevin Darcy) wrote:
- >In article <1993Jan7.014459.14742@blilly.uucp> lilb@sony.compuserve.com (Bruce Lilly) writes:
- >>which is currently somewhere around 3.1.27.1 (no doubt several smail fans
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >Oh, really? Has the smail3.1 dev team recently been kidnapped by sendmail
- >terrorists while working on 3.1.29?
-
- Please learn how to read.
-
- >>It's time to junk it and put something
- >>useful in its place (unless you enjoy the challenge of dealing with your
- >>ongoing mail problems). Of course, you're free to do as you please, but you
- >>asked for advice, and I've given mine, along with justification for my
- >>position. Good luck to you, whatever you choose to do.
- >
- >The poster asked for advice on a package that was quite clearly smail3, Mr.
-
- No, the poster was asking for advice on how to solve a problem with email
- that couldn't be sent. Go read the original article, or the reposted one.
-
- --
- Bruce Lilly ...uupsi!monymsys!sonyd1!blilly!bruce
-