home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!fgw!fdm!ace!melby
- From: melby@dove.yk.fujitsu.co.jp (John B. Melby)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.internat
- Subject: Re: Language tagging
- Message-ID: <MELBY.93Jan8102729@dove.yk.fujitsu.co.jp>
- Date: 8 Jan 93 10:27:29 GMT
- References: <MELBY.93Jan6113951@dove.yk.fujitsu.co.jp> <1iennfINN92a@frigate.doc.ic.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@ace.yk.fujitsu.co.jp
- Organization: Open Systems Group, Fujitsu Limited, Yokohama
- Lines: 14
- In-reply-to: rap@news's message of 6 Jan 93 13:44:15 GMT
-
- >About the only radical where the simplified form doesn't
- >get a different codepoint (unless something else in the character changes)
- >is the "grass" radical -- "+ +" (4 strokes) vs "++" (3 strokes) -- but
- >that shouldn't interfere too much with legibility.
-
- Thanks for the clarification. It has also been pointed out that the
- traditional forms of the "eating" radical with the strokes "/\" and "="
- at the bottom are not distinguished, except in the case of "inryou no in"/
- "yin3liao4 de yin3" (for the reason that it has two codepoints in JISX0208).
-
- -----
- John B. Melby
- Fujitsu Limited, Yokohama
- melby@yk.fujitsu.co.jp
-