home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1 / NN_1993_1.iso / spool / comp / std / cplus / 1985 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-06  |  825 b   |  20 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!gatech!udel!rochester!rit!cci632!dwr
  3. From: dwr@cci632.cci.com (Donald W. Rouse II)
  4. Subject: Re: Argument matching
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan6.192651.20972@cci632.cci.com>
  6. Organization: [Computer Consoles, Inc., Rochester, NY
  7. References: <1992Dec31.053242.3376@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <1992Dec31.170854.21696@lpi.liant.com> <1993Jan1.161813.1592@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
  8. Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 19:26:51 GMT
  9. Lines: 9
  10.  
  11. In article <1993Jan1.161813.1592@ucc.su.OZ.AU> maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (John MAX Skaller) writes:
  12. >[...]  I would argue it is better style to have
  13. >two functions with different names:
  14. >
  15. >    func_f(const int&); // proper function
  16. >    proc_f(int&);  // procedure--warning side effects!
  17. >
  18.  
  19. But you can't do this with (i.e., rename) constructors.
  20.