home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!opl.com!regina!harvey
- From: harvey@opl.com (Harvey Reed)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: virtual destructors by default
- Message-ID: <harvey.726176339@regina>
- Date: 4 Jan 93 19:38:59 GMT
- References: <24544@alice.att.com>
- Sender: news@opl.com
- Lines: 15
-
- ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig) writes:
-
- >For these reasons, I am dubious about the proposal. I do think, though,
- >that it is wise for compilers to issue warning messages for classes
- >with virtual functions that do not also have virtual destructors.
-
- I agree. Tis better for compilers to make the programmer more aware,
- than to do too much automatically.
-
-
- --
- ++harvey
- ========================================================================
- internet: harvey@opl.com / hreed@cs.ulowell.edu / h.reed@ieee.org
- voice: 617-965-0220
-