home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utgpu!rayan
- From: rayan@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Rayan Zachariassen)
- Subject: Re: Negative caching
- Message-ID: <C0rGzI.18q@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
- Organization: UTCS Public Access
- References: <by91Hibayb@atlantis.psu.edu> <1ihlanINNlj9@daisy.ee.und.ac.za> <#gb1Hfjgyb@atlantis.psu.edu> <1ii2nsINNnsj@daisy.ee.und.ac.za> <C0IB0C.B6u@uunet.ca> <VIXIE.93Jan10123547@cognition.pa.dec.com>
- Distribution: inet
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:57:16 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In <VIXIE.93Jan10123547@cognition.pa.dec.com> vixie@pa.dec.com (Paul A Vixie) writes:
-
- >yikes. negative cachine was in utbind, and yet nobody from ut answered
- >my request for 4.9 alpha testers?
-
- What Geoff said. I'd have liked to poke at 4.9, I even went looking for it
- one evening, but doing justice to an alpha or beta or even later on integrating
- negative caching requires a serious time commitment (like, a dozen hours
- or so) where time is already too scarce.
-
- Besides, BIND and the DNS don't work too well. I'd rather spend that time
- telling someone how to do it better :-). If only a sugardaddy would fund it.
-
- Perhaps we should hold a bind-bash.... err, namedroppers lunch at Usenix.
-
- rayan
-