home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1 / NN_1993_1.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / misc / 41683 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1993-01-08  |  994 b   |  24 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!gatech!swrinde!ringer!lonestar.utsa.edu!sorourke
  3. From: sorourke@lonestar.utsa.edu (Sean J. Orourke)
  4. Subject: FreeCell? (was Re: Windows NT vs OS/2: Does NT worth the wait?)
  5. Message-ID: <1993Jan8.233359.17464@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
  6. Sender: news@ringer.cs.utsa.edu
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: lonestar.utsa.edu
  8. Organization: University of Texas at San Antonio
  9. References: <79270@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1iip41INNol9@access.usask.ca>
  10. Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 23:33:59 GMT
  11. Lines: 11
  12.  
  13. In article <1iip41INNol9@access.usask.ca> friesend@jester.usask.ca (Darryl Friesen) writes:
  14. [ a lot deleted ]
  15. >Windows 3.1 for Workgroups.  The best thing I've seen about the NT beta
  16. >so far is the new game FreeCell.  :)  Personally, I prefer OS/2.  I like
  17.  
  18. Would you describe it here so someone can work on an OS/2 version? :)  Or mail
  19. a description to me if you feel it'd be a waste of bandwidth.
  20.  
  21. Thanks,
  22.  
  23. Sean
  24.