home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!asuvax!ncar!uchinews!ellis!sip1
- From: sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu (Timothy F. Sipples)
- Subject: Re: Is this in OS/2 2.1 ?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan6.040016.16996@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: sip1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: Dept. of Econ., Univ. of Chicago
- References: <1993Jan02.181730.17751@donau.et.tudelft.nl>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 04:00:16 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1993Jan02.181730.17751@donau.et.tudelft.nl> linstee@dutecaj.et.tudelft.nl (Erik van Linstee) writes:
- >I find myself a lot in a situation were I want different font sizes
- >for different dos/os2 boxes. Like for instances, when I have turbo
- >pascal or borland c running, I have them in 50 line mode, so I
- >set a 14x8 font to get them on the screen. However, whenever I
- >do a run (starting a program which uses 25 line mode) I have to
- >resize afterwards.
- >So, does os/2 2.1 offer:
- >- font size settings on a per app. basis.
- >- dynamic adjustment of windows or,
- >- static window size, that does not adjust downward.
- >I know that the latter can be done by maximising the window, but
- >this also means it always ends up in the top left corner whenever
- >it has been iconised.
-
- Actually, if you hold down SHIFT while dragging on the border (to
- expand the window to its maximum size), you'll avoid the "top left"
- problem. SHIFT-maximize is really a bad idea, generally.
-
- Not yet on the other questions -- they would be welcome additions.
-
- --
- Timothy F. Sipples | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
- sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
- Dept. of Econ., Univ. | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
- of Chicago, 60637 | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]
-