home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:12175 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3822
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!bdubbs
- From: bdubbs@cs.tamu.edu (Bruce Dubbs)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Subject: Re: CS, what do they know?
- Date: 13 Jan 1993 04:52:51 GMT
- Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
- Lines: 25
- Message-ID: <1j0773INNeu4@tamsun.tamu.edu>
- References: <1993Jan10.181146.1122@cmkrnl.com> <1993Jan12.211407.3795@sequent.com> <1993Jan12.225657.7224@gw.wmich.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: neuron.tamu.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan12.225657.7224@gw.wmich.edu> x90wardell@gw.wmich.edu writes:
- |
- | The CS curriculum is sure on the ball around here. I am taking
- |an operating systems class and the professor had never heard of WIndows
- |NT (but did know a bit about OS/2).
-
- Actually its not limited to your school. You have to understand what
- the objectives of the faculty in academia are. The objectives are to
- write papers and get them published. It does not matter if the
- content of the papers is meaningful or not, just the number of papers
- you get published and the number of times your papers are cited.
-
- You must understand, OS/2 and Windows NT offer no new ideas. They are
- only new implementations of old ideas. They are "beneath" the notice
- of most (not all) CS faculty.
-
- For an interesting (and tragic) discussion, read "Imposters in the
- Temple" by M. Anderson.
- -- Bruce
-
-
- --
- Bruce Dubbs | Oxymorons of note:
- bdubbs@neuron.tamu.edu | Honest Politician, Political Science,
- | Scrupulous Lawyer
-