home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!lims01.lerc.nasa.gov!scdorcy
- From: scdorcy@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov (JAMES DORCEY)
- Subject: Re: Is Microsoft using "Force"???
- Message-ID: <6JAN199317164962@lims01.lerc.nasa.gov>
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
- Sender: news@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lims01.lerc.nasa.gov
- Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center
- References: <1993Jan4.203709.25238@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <8317@lib.tmc.edu> <1993Jan5.011546.28910@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <8326@lib.tmc.edu> <wiegand.726333920@lido16>
- Date: 6 Jan 1993 17:16 EST
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <wiegand.726333920@lido16>, motcid!wiegand@uunet.uu.net writes...
- >helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman) writes:
- >
- >> COERCE suggests overcoming resistance or unwillingness by actual
- >> or threatened violence or pressure.
- ^^^^^^^^^^^
- >>In order for an action to properly be called "coercion" there MUST be the
- >>threat of or actional violence, of the which and by the way so there may be
- >>no confusion on this point here is the definition of violence:
-
- >Why don't you read your own definition. Violence is not required.
- >The word "or" is usually used to indicate a choice of two things.
- >Only one need to be true for the statement to be true.
-
- Well let's see, so far this week Randall has shown that he doesn't
- understand "Just-In-Time" and that he can't read his own definition. And
- today's only Wednesday :-)
-