home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu!jmaynard
- From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! :)
- Message-ID: <8349@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 6 Jan 1993 15:29:14 GMT
- References: <1993Jan5.011546.28910@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <8326@lib.tmc.edu> <1993Jan5.190756.23050@nosc.mil>
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston
- Lines: 53
- Nntp-Posting-Host: oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan5.190756.23050@nosc.mil> discar@nosc.mil (Joe Discar) writes:
- >Microsoft did not FORCE Gateway to choose to put MS-DOS on all their
- >machines. Gateway CHOSE to do so. Gateway is CONTINUOUSLY choosing to do
- >so. They can, at any given timeframe, simply say "well, MS-DOS+Windows is
- >not selling as well as it used to--too many customers are asking for OS/2,
- >so let's start shipping machines with OS/2 instead. Betty get me the number
- >for IBM..."
-
- According to the news reports posted here, the contracts between MS and the
- manufacturers run for 3 years...so if they started selling computers with
- OS/2, they'd STILL have to pay MS-DOS and Windows royalties for every machine
- they sell.
-
- >As I've posted before, exclusivity is NOT new to the world. Soda pop
- >companies "force" (to use your terminology) large fast food chains to sign
- >exclusivity agreements. That's why you won't see pepsi in Burger King or
- >McDonalds... But the fast food restaraunts can always switch companies
- >IF THEY DEEM IT PROFITABLE TO DO SO--Burger King made headlines when it
- >switched to Coke... but the FTC didn't go near ANY of the transactions.
-
- Gateway 2000 can't switch; they're locked in for whatever period is left on
- that contract.
-
- Besides, not even Coke or Pepsi can keep Dr Pepper out of fast food chains...
-
- >Dammit. If you want to ride the Matterhorn, ya gotta go to Disneyland. And
- >if you think the entrance fee is "fair" you obviously don't have a family
- >of six (like I do). If you want MS-DOS or Windows you gotta go to Microsoft...
- >there just is no way you can get those products otherwise. Is this the
- >"coersion" you're talking about?
-
- No; the situation with MS is like Disney telling you that, if you want to ride
- the Matterhorn, you have to pay them their ticket price when you go to Knott's
- Berry Farm.
-
- >Likewise, vendors are out there selling MSDOS and Windows because their
- >clients WANT MS-DOS and Windows. And because so many of them want it,
- >the vendors find it profitable to get the best deal they can on it. This
- >leads to cheaper prices for the vendor, cheaper prices for ALL of the
- >clients, and bigger profits for the developer. The only people that aren't
- >happy are a minority that can't get it through their heads that the
- >resulting price of the system is usually CHEAPER than if the vendor never
- >signed the agreement.
-
- I'm still paying for a MS-DOS and Windows license I neither need nor want.
- If someone wants MS-DOS and Windows, fine, let them pay for it, but don't make
- me subsidize their choice.
-
- --
- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
- "Science is all in the public domain, and allows few secrets."
- -- Tom Clancy, _The Sum of All Fears_
-