home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!hardy.u.washington.edu!mhuth
- From: mhuth@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Huth)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: NT Destined to Succeed??
- Date: 6 Jan 1993 05:47:47 GMT
- Organization: University of Washington
- Lines: 17
- Message-ID: <1idrq3INNqk0@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- References: <1993Jan04.184825.3260@microsoft.com> <1993Jan5.040741.27996@midway.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan05.075016.28032@microsoft.com> <1993Jan5.234912.7841@midway.uchicago.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hardy.u.washington.edu
-
- soh3@quads.uchicago.edu (min-woong sohn) writes:
-
-
- >Hey, you only have personal experience with a system with 12 megs of
- >memory and you'are calling Steve liar????
-
- >Is NT really bootin up on 8 meg systems? Is there anybody who has
- >personal experience with this?
-
- >Mi
-
- I've run it in 8 megs...it isn't as fast as os/2 in 8 megs, but it isn't
- horrible either. I'd suppose I'd suggest that it runs like a beta...(grin)
- I've been told how to remove the networking and other parts that I don't need
- on that particular machine. I'll give it a try and see how much it speeds
- NT up. I'm told that removing unneeded modules makes it quite zippy in 8
- megs. n
-