home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!batcomputer!msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu!bai
- From: bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor)
- Subject: Re: Is Microsoft the next Standard Oil?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.225440.14879@tc.cornell.edu>
- Sender: news@tc.cornell.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu
- Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization
- References: <8305@lib.tmc.edu> <1993Jan4.225618.8531@tc.cornell.edu> <8322@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 22:54:40 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <8322@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan4.225618.8531@tc.cornell.edu> bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor) writes:
- >>In article <8305@lib.tmc.edu> jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
- >>>On the other hand, a company _can_ put another company out of business. Who
- >>>needs guns?
- >>That makes as much sense as saying that if few persons applied for
- >>a single job, the successful candiate made the rest unemployed.
- >
- >I'd say the same thing if the successful candidate used unfair tactics to get
- >the job.
-
- If the successful candidate increased his/her employment probability
- by becoming more marketable, went for many interviews, wrote nice
- resumes, convinced employers that he/she is valuable to them, would
- you say that he/she is forcing the other candidates into unemployment ?
-
-
- Dov
-
-
-