home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu!jmaynard
- From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! : )
- Message-ID: <8313@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 4 Jan 1993 20:48:53 GMT
- References: <1993Jan4.002059.13213@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <8295@lib.tmc.edu> <1993Jan4.184138.23659@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston
- Lines: 62
- Nntp-Posting-Host: oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan4.184138.23659@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman) writes:
- >In article <8295@lib.tmc.edu>, jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) writes:
- >|> Let's try a slight modification: The next time I need screws, I order the same
- >|> quantity from _both_ suppliers.
- >As far as I've heard, even the most exclusive agreements that Microsoft offers
- >allow for this. To parallel, suppose that a Clones-R-US decides to offer
- >OS/2 to its customers on a trial basis. They simply order Windows from
- >Microsoft pursuant to the agreement they have with them and a case of OS/2
- >from IBM.
-
- Actually, they simply order the case of OS/2; their agreement with MS involves
- no ordering at all.
- I'll agree that, in the case of this scenario, that that's a nit.
-
- >|> I try the screws from 2 Guys Garage.
- >Clones-R-US looks at the sales figures for OS/2 vs. Windows.
-
- OK, I'll grant that...
-
- >|> If they work out, I switch;
- >If enough of Clones-R-US customers like OS/2, then Clones offers OS/2.
-
- Here's the catch: they still pay MS for the machines which have OS/2 on them.
-
- >|> if not, I go back to the case I have in stock from ACME.
- >If not, Clones-R-us sticks with the agreements it has with Microsoft.
-
- OK here.
-
- >In conclusion, if a JIT agreement doesn't restrict a savy businessman from
- >trying out new suppliers, than neither does the kind of agreements which
- >Microsoft offers.
-
- Nope...MS' agreement would be like me having to buy one screw from ACME for
- every screw I buy from 2 Guys Garage, knowing that those screws would never
- get used.
-
- >Righto!!! And just as a sufficiently JIT businessman not need the FTC to
- >step in, neither does a sufficiently smark Cloner.
-
- Sorry. As long as they have to pay for DOS and Windows, even for those
- machines that go out without them, the situation is unfair.
-
- >Get thee hence to reality forsooth!! Thou mayest buy Clones with OS/2 or
- >UNIX preinstallethed!!!
-
- (preinstallethed?? :-)
- Thankfully, sone clone vendors are beginning to see the light. Many of the
- major ones, though, do not.
-
- >|> MS has a near-monopoly, and are doing all they can, legitimately and
- >|> otherwise, to reinforce it. You hold that up as the Holy Grail. I say it's bad
- >|> for the consumer.
- >Show me a consumer whose hurt.
-
- Tried to buy a Gateway 2000, or a Zeos, without Windows and DOS lately? You're
- paying for it regardless. That's hurting the consumer.
- --
- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
- "Science is all in the public domain, and allows few secrets."
- -- Tom Clancy, _The Sum of all Fears_
-