home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:11593 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3669
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!ecn.purdue.edu!helz
- From: helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman)
- Subject: Re: Is Microsoft the next Standard Oil?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.183115.23500@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- Sender: news@noose.ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
- Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
- References: <1993Jan2.225225.7080@gw.wmich.edu> <1i75u6INNbe4@shelley.u.washington.edu> <1993Jan4.005008.13699@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1i9fgdINN2bu@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:31:15 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1i9fgdINN2bu@shelley.u.washington.edu>, tzs@stein.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) writes:
- |> helz@ecn.purdue.edu (Randall A Helzerman) writes:
- |> |>Here's a third way for them to have all the drilling equipment: tell drilling
- |> |>equipment customers that unless they purchase Standard Oil drilling equipment,
- |> |>and do not purchase drilling equipment from others, they will no longer be
- |> |>sold oil from Standard Oil. If they control enough of the oil market (because
- |> |>they were more efficient than the competition, say), they could use that to
- |> |>dominate the drilling equipment market, even though they might not be more
- |> |>efficient there.
- |> |
- |> |Even in that case, the total cost to drilling equiptment users of oil +
- |> |drilling equiptment must be less than any anybody else could *possibly* do
- |> |it for Standard Oil to maintain its monopoly.
- |>
- |> Yes, but the cost of drilling equipment from someone else plus oil from
- |> Standard Oil would be less than the cost of buying both from Standard Oil.
-
- Agreed--but Microsoft isn't doing anything remotely resembling this.
-
-