home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!pan.mc.ti.com!a722756
- From: a722756@roper.mc.ti.com (W. Donald Rolph)
- Subject: Re: Opinions on Microsoft QuickC for Windows?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.154711@roper.mc.ti.com>
- Originator: a722756@roper.mc.ti.com
- Sender: usenet@pan.mc.ti.com (USENET News System)
- Organization: Texas Instruments / Attleboro Mass / USA
- References: <1992Dec30.191610.3685@pony.Ingres.COM>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 20:47:11 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
-
- In article <1992Dec30.191610.3685@pony.Ingres.COM>, bonobo@Ingres.COM (David Victor) writes:
- |> Has anyone out there had much experience with QuickC for Windows? I was
- |> just wondering if I could get an opinion as to its usefulness. Are there
- |> other CASE tools which blow away QuickCase:W?
- |>
- |> Thanks!
- |>
- |> -David Victor
-
- For what its worth, I like it since it provides a rudimentary but effective
- integrated environment. I just wish they would release an update of it from the
- original 1.0. (I particularly like the debuggin environment which seems to do a
- good job of protecting you from protection faults).
- --
-
- Regards.
-
- Don Rolph a722756@pan.mc.ti.com WD3 MS10-13 (508)-699-1263
-