home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.apps
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!silver.ucs.indiana.edu!ntaib
- From: ntaib@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Iskandar Taib)
- Subject: Re: MS Word upgrade worth it?
- Message-ID: <C0C7DK.49t@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: silver.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University
- References: <19159@mindlink.bc.ca> <1i6n4rINN373@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 16:05:44 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- What everyone seems to forget (since Word 1.0 has, in my mind, been
- long gone and buried) were all the discussions about bad memory handling
- that 1.0 was famous for. Not too surprising, since it was released
- back in the Windows 2.11 days and was written to run under, but not
- really take advantage, of Windows 3.0. It UAE'ed a lot, I remember,
- and is just plain ugly compared to WinWord 2.
-
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Iskandar Taib | The only thing worse than Peach ala
- Internet: NTAIB@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU | Frog is Frog ala Peach
- Bitnet: NTAIB@IUBACS !
-