home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!udel!princeton!phoenix.Princeton.EDU!bathurst
- From: bathurst@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Bruce Bathurst)
- Subject: Re: IBM XT upgrade
- Message-ID: <1993Jan8.161431.24383@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: phoenix.princeton.edu
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1993Jan5.142415.7589@spectrum.xerox.com> <1993Jan7.032313.6224@vpnet.chi.il.us>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 16:14:31 GMT
- Lines: 42
-
- In article <1993Jan7.032313.6224@vpnet.chi.il.us>
- cgordon@vpnet.chi.il.us (gordon hlavenka) writes:
-
- [SNIP,SNIP]
-
- >So, he upgraded his _286_ to Windows 3.1, and it's now even more
- >slothful than before. So he traded in the machine on a 386DX/40.
-
- [SNIP,SNIP]
-
- I did something similar--twice--in recommending 1992 MS-DOS software
- to people with 286's: the Norton Desktop for DOS, and Lotus Works.
- (I hadn't bought software for my 8088 in years; what did I know.) Well,
- I got them both to run these at usable speeds, but the AT's are so
- highly tuned you can almost hear them resonate.
-
- The $3 Ad packets on the news stand say a 25 Mhz 486 is the minimal
- machine now. The 386 is a micro-mainframe; and companies like
- Microsoft never even offered an operating system for it, there was no
- demand for 32-bit memory or devices (other than video). People are
- buying 486's for simple ICONS and WYSIWYG word processing. I
- panicked: "I can't useful things on my 8088! Thousands of lemmings
- can't be wrong!"
-
- They weren't: new commercial wares, even for DOS, won't run on 286's.
- (A hark back to those romantic days when IBM sold both mainframe
- hardware and software.)
-
- The solution is to buy DOS shareware--or used, older versions of
- commercial software--and a simple program for writing menus.
-
- BTW, I discovered DR-DOS comes with a cute optional interface of ICONS
- and windows (in selectable color schemes) that works nicely with its
- task switcher. I've used UNIX for years. How often do I run programs
- in the background, rather than stop them and switch to another?
- Almost never.
-
- Bruce (Gypsy Scholar)
- --
- Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences
- Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544
- bathurst@phoenix.princeton.edu bathurst@pucc.bitnet !princeton!phoenix!bathurst
-